Skip to content

Posts from the ‘The Logic of Discipline’ Category

Article discusses Logic of Discipline

Screen Shot 2015-07-20 at 10.45.32 AMA new article by Matthew Flinders and Matt Wood in the journal New Political Science discusses my 2010 book The Logic of Discipline.  “Roberts’s major study of the proliferation of technocratic governance shows that, paradoxically, hyperdepoliticization has occurred at the same time as hyper-democracy.”  Read the article.

Review of Logic of Discipline in Historical Materialism

Screen Shot 2015-04-03 at 11.21.05 PMThe journal Historical Materialism has published a review of The Logic of Discipline by Safi Shams.  Link to the review.

Talk at Brown University’s Taubman Center

Screen Shot 2014-09-12 at 6.33.28 AMOn October 16, I’ll be giving a talk based on my book The Logic of Discipline at Brown University’s Taubman Center for Public Policy and American Institutions.  Details here.

CIDE to publish Spanish language edition of Logic of Discipline

LogicOfDisciplineHonored that the Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE) will publish a Spanish language edition of “The Logic of Discipline” next year.

n+1 magazine reviews End of Protest and Logic of Discipline

Screen Shot 2014-08-04 at 11.50.49 PMThe Fall 2014 issue of n+1 magazine includes a review essay by Jamie Martin discussing The End of Protest and The Logic of Discipline. “The 2008 crash and its aftermath have amounted, as the legal scholar Alasdair Roberts argues in The End of Protest, to little more than a ‘quiet crisis.'”  Read the review.

Logic of Discipline discussed in The Nation

Screen Shot 2014-05-18 at 5.54.43 AMIn the June 2 issue of The Nation, Thomas Meaney and Yascha Mounk write an essay on the state of democracy that discusses The Logic of Discipline and several other books.  “There are three principal reasons for democracy’s deepening crisis of legitimacy,” write Meaney and Mounk. “The first is rooted in what Alasdair Roberts has called the ‘logic of discipline,’ which refers to the strictures that the draftsmen of global capitalism introduced into the blueprints of national governments during the past three decades.”  Read the essay.

Technocrats or populists: Who gained influence during the financial crisis?

Screen Shot 2014-03-20 at 10.03.34 AMThese notes were prepared for a talk at Victoria University of Wellington on May 14.  Many scholars of public administration characterize the three decades between 1978 and 2008 as a period when we reconsidered the best way to organize public services. In fact, the stakes were higher than that. The essential question was an old one: in a democratic system, should power be put in the hands of technocrats, or citizens and their elected representatives? There was certainly a powerful global movement for democratization during that period. But there was an equally powerful, and ultimately more successful, movement for the shift of power into the hands of technocrats. Read more

In Policy & Politics, discussion of “Logic of Discipline”

LogicOfDisciplineThe current issue of Policy & Politics provides a special collection of papers on depoliticization, governance and the state edited by Matthew Flinders and Matt Wood.  In the final paper, Colin Hay of Sciences Po discusses The Logic of Discipline in the context of the recent financial crisis.  “Yes, there has been a widely acknowledged crisis,” says Hay. “But, as the contributions in this collection all make clear, the tendency in the wake of the crisis has been to reaffirm and further consolidate a ‘logic of discipline’ over a logic of public accountability and/or democratic choice.”  Free access to Hay’s article: Depoliticisation as process, governance as practice.

New Left Project discusses “Logic of Discipline”

Screen Shot 2014-01-01 at 11.24.05 AMToday’s lead article on the New Left Project website, by Tom Mills, discusses The Logic of Discipline and the “dynamics of neoliberal governance.”

Foreign Affairs publishes article on role of Federal Reserve

FirefoxScreenSnapz001Foreign Affairs has just published my article, Who should run the Fed?  “The fight over who will succeed Ben Bernanke as chair of the U.S. Federal Reserve rolls on, getting bigger and more tangled as it goes. It is easy to get caught up in the debate about the merits of different candidates, but doing so misses a larger point. The real story here is the intensity of the fight itself, which is evidence of a shift of power toward central bankers that began under U.S. President Ronald Reagan and has been aggravated since the financial crisis of 2008.”